Warning: Undefined array key "ENABLE_ERROR_HANDLER" in /home/tuckerellis/webapps/tucker-ellis/config/application.php on line 103
Before COVID-19 Discouraged Litigation Tourism, There Were Snap Removals - Tucker Ellis LLP
Skip to content

Internet Explorer is no longer supported by this website.

For optimal browsing we recommend using Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Publications

Before COVID-19 Discouraged Litigation Tourism, There Were Snap Removals

July 2020 - American Bar Association, Mass Torts Litigation

Publications

Before COVID-19 Discouraged Litigation Tourism, There Were Snap Removals

July 2020 - American Bar Association, Mass Torts Litigation

Let’s start with a simple civil procedure hypothetical: A Texas plaintiff sues a New Jersey corporation and a California corporation in a California state court claiming $80,000 in damages. The New Jersey defendant, knowing that it is the intended target of the lawsuit and that the California defendant is only tangentially relevant to the plaintiff’s claims, confirms that no defendant has been served and removes the action to federal court. Is the removal proper? What if the California defendant removes three days after the complaint is filed? Or one day? Or 10 minutes?

Read the article here.

Authors

Related News

COVID-19 and Ivermectin Lawsuits

DeAngelo A. LaVette, Nathan P. Nasrallah, published in American Bar Association, Section of Litigation, Mass Torts Litigation More